Women's Health Medicine
Volume 3, Issue 5 , Pages 197-201, 1 September 2006

Outcome following extremely preterm birth

Neil Marlow MBBS MA DM FRCP FRCPCH is Professor of Neonatal Medicine at the University of Nottingham and Consultant Neonatologist for the Nottingham Neonatal Service. He is lead investigator for the national EPICure Study. His research interests include the sequelae of prematurity and mechanisms of impaired development following perinatal events. He qualified from St John’s Oxford and UCH, London and was Senior Lecturer in Bristol before moving to Nottingham in 1997

Abstract 

Survival and later morbidity after extremely preterm birth are key issues to factor into the care of women and their children at borderline viability. Whereas we have robustly collected information on survival that shows some increases at 24–25 weeks of gestation, few data suggest any change in morbidity. Of babies born before 26 weeks of gestation around one quarter grow up with serious disability. Mild disabilities are common amongst the remainder. Overwhelmingly the major adverse outcome following extremely preterm birth is cognitive impairment, something that may not be apparent until school age, when we make increasing demands on children to perform. Despite these problems, studies of very preterm/very low birthweight children as adults seem to indicate good adaptation and integration into society.

Keywords:  neonatal , preterm birth , learning difficulties , trent neonatal

No full text is available. To read the body of this article, please view the PDF online.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 9.95 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This article has been reproduced from: Current Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2006; 16(3): 141–146.

PII: S1744-1870(06)70203-7

doi:10.1053/S1744-1870(06)70203-7

Women's Health Medicine
Volume 3, Issue 5 , Pages 197-201, 1 September 2006

Article Tools